I really don't get the departmental exams here, or at least the procedure's surrounding them. On a very naive level, they make sense. No one is screwed out of a grade by a squirrelly Professor's incongruesly hard tests while another in the same class gets and A only because their Professor is very lax. It can also help gaurantee that certain standards in education for that department are met.
All of this, however, goes out the window when A) Professors
are not allowed to know what is on the exam in anyting other but the vaguest sense, by which I mean they know the chapters it covers, and that's about it and B) reviews, study guides, etc. are not allowed.
So, the Professors don't have any way to mold their cirruculmn around the exam which they are purposely supposed to (how can it be otherwise when the exams are designed to count for 50% of a student's grade?) and the students have no way to figure out how to divide up or study 300 pages of text reading, and five websites covering additional information?
For instance, while studying for my Fitness for Living departmental exam, of which the average grade is 42%, I studided EKG's. What they do, how they do it. I was not, however, given any information in either my lectures or my textbook whether or not an EKG is infallible.
Really? The test, which is supposed to focus on application, didn't care whether I knew what an EKG was for, or why I should get one, or how to use the information from it, the steps involved in the process, or what kind of health problems or risks they can reveal. No. None of that mattered.
(Also interesting is how this is often the case for general education classes. It just feels like another one of MSU's tricks to get our money by having us fail a course they know we have to take. They do something similiar with our computer intro classes. The exam to waive the class is extremely difficult, I took it and failed by 3 % (You need an 80% to pass) and the test-taking procedure itself is very faulty. Accidentally hit a wrong key on a single step of one 10-step long problem and immediatly miss the entire problem, no take-backsies. And yet the class itself is completely remedial. You learn how to OPEN A FILE and MAKE A WORD DOCUMENT.)
Maybe I'm just exceptionally bitter because, being a nit-picking student who cleared a 4.0 relatively easy last year and did put in an honorable amount of pro-fucking-active studying for this exam, I get my results back on and was so ASHAMED of myself that I immediatly felt nausesous and threw-up.
And I'd be way fucking angrier if I weren't so goddamded depressed for failing.